Previous Page  22 / 23 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 22 / 23 Next Page
Page Background

А.С. Птускин, Е. Левнер, Ю.М. Жукова

126

ISSN 0236-3941. Вестник МГТУ им. Н.Э. Баумана. Сер. Машиностроение. 2016. № 6

[18]

Cengiz K. Fuzzy multi-criteria decision making: theory and applications with recent de-

velopments. Springer, 2008. 591 p. DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-76813-7

[19]

Herva M., Roca E. Review of combined approaches and multi-criteria analysis for corpo-

rate environmental evaluation.

Journal of Cleaner Production

, 2013, vol. 39, pp. 355–371.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.07.058

[20]

Wang J.J., Jing Y.Y., Zhang C.F., Zhao J.H. Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid

in sustainable energy decision-making.

Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev

., 2009, vol. 13, no. 9,

pp. 2263–2278. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2009.06.021

[21]

Baysal M.E., Sarucan A., Kahraman C., Engin O. The selection of renewableenergy pow-

er plant technology using fuzzy data envelopment analysis.

Proceedings of the 2011 World

Congress on Engineering

, 2011, pp. 1140–1143.

[22]

Bonano E.J., Apostolakis G.E., Salter P.F., Ghassemi A., Jennings S. Application of risk

assessment and decision analysis to the evaluation, ranking and selection of environmental

remediation alternatives.

J. Hazard. Mater

., 2000, vol. 71, no. 1-3, pp. 35–57.

DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3894(99)00071-0

[23]

Chowdhury S., Husain T. Evaluation of drinking water treatment technology: an entro-

py-based fuzzy application.

J. Environ. Eng

., 2006, vol. 132, no. 10, pp. 1264–1271.

DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2006)132:10(1264)

[24]

Geldermann J., Rentz O. Integrated technique assessment with imprecise information as

a support for the determination of best available techniques (BAT).

Spektrum

, 2001, vol. 23,

no. 1, pp. 137–157. DOI: 10.1007/PL00013341

[25]

Krajnc D., Mele M., Glavic P. Fuzzy logic model for the performance benchmarking of

sugar plants by considering best available techniques.

Resour. Conserv. Recycl.

, 2007, vol. 52,

no. 2, pp. 314–330. DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2007.05.001

[26]

Lin G.T.R., Shen Y.C. A collaborative model for technology evaluation and decision-

making.

J. Sci. Indus. Res

., 2010, vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 94–100.

[27]

Prabhu T.R., Vizayakumar K. Technology choice using FHDM: a case of iron- making

technology.

IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag

., 2001, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 209–222.

DOI: 10.1109/17.922479

[28]

Sadiq R., Khan F.I., Veitch B. Evaluating offshore technologies for produced water man-

agement using GreenPro-I: a risk-based life cycle analysis for green and clean process selection

and design.

Comput. Chem. Eng

., 2005, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 1023–1039.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2004.11.003

[29]

Wang J.J., Jing Y.Y., Zhang C.F., Shi G.H., Zhang X.T. A fuzzy multi-criteria decision-

making model for trigeneration system.

Energy Policy

, 2008, vol. 36, no. 10, pp. 3823–3832.

DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.07.002

[30]

GOST R 54097–2010. Resursosberezhenie. Nailuchshie dostupnye tekhnologii. Metod-

ologiya identifikatsii. [State standard R 54097-2010. Resources saving. Best available tech-

niques. Identification methodology]. 2012.

[31]

Ptuskin A.S. A problem of capital budgeting with fuzzy sets.

Ekonomika i mate-

maticheskie metody

, 2005, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 95–101 (in Russ.).

[32]

Hwang C.L., Yoon K. Multiple attributes decision making methods and applications.

Heidelberg, Berlin, Springer, 1981. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9