21 / 23
Многокритериальная модель определения наилучшей доступной технологии…
ISSN 0236-3941. Вестник МГТУ им. Н.Э. Баумана. Сер. Машиностроение. 2016. № 6
125
2014 No. 219-FZ "On amendments to the federal law on environmental protection” and cer-
tain legislative acts of the Russian Federation"].
[3] Volkov V.I. Procedure of expert estimation of projects with innovation trend.
Vestnik
MGTU im. N.E. Baumana. Ser. Mashinostroenie
[Herald of the Bauman Moscow State Tech-
nical University. Ser. Mechanical Engineering], 2004, no. 3, pp. 100–113 (in Russ.).
[4] BREF economics and cross-media effects. URL:
http://eippcb.jrc.ec.europa.eu/reference/ecm.html (accessed 10.05.2016)
[5] Kleiner G.B. Economic and mathematical methods and economic theory.
Ekonomika i
matematicheskie metody
, 2001, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 111–126 (in Russ.).
[6] Panova S.A., Tishaeva I.R. System model for identification of the best available technology
(BAT).
Vestnik MITHT
, 2014, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 83–85 (in Russ.).
[7] Zhuravel N.M. Expert system for the environmental and economic efficiency of best avail-
able technology in improving the exploitation of natural resources in Siberia.
Interexpo Geo-
Sibir
[Interexpo Geo-Siberia], 2014, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 95–99 (in Russ.).
[8]
Ivanushkin S.V., Chechevatova O.U. The methodical approach to the definition of domes-
tic best available technologies.
Izvestiya Instituta Inzhenernoy Phiziki
, 2015, vol. 2,
no. 36, pp. 77–79 (in Russ.).
[9] Giner-Santonja G., Aragonés-Beltrán P., Niclós-Ferragut J. The application of the analytic
network process to the assessment of best available techniques.
Journal of Cleaner Production
,
2012, vol. 25, pp. 86–95. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.12.012
[10]
Belton V., Stewart T. Multiple criteria decision analysis. An integrated approach. Dor-
drecht, Netherlands, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002. 372 p.
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-1495-4
[11]
Huang I.B., Keisler J., Linkov I. Multi-criteria decision analysis in environmental science:
ten years of applications and trends.
Science of the Total Environment
, 2011, vol. 409, no. 19,
pp. 3578–3594. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.06.022
[12]
Ibáñez-Forés V., Bovea M.D., Pérez-Belis V. A holistic review of applied methodologies
for assessing and selecting the optimal technological alternative from a sustainability perspec-
tive.
Journal of Cleaner Production
, 2014, vol. 70, pp. 259–281.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.082
[13]
Bréchet T., Tulkens H. Beyond BAT: selecting optimal combinations of available tech-
niques, with an example from the limestone industry.
Journal of Environmental Management
,
2009, vol. 90, no. 5, pp. 1790–1801. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.11.012
[14]
Ptuskin A.S. Nechetkie modeli i metody v menedjmente [Fuzzy models and methods in
management]. Moscow, Bauman MSTU Publ., 2008. 216 p.
[15]
Levner E.V., Ptuskin A.S., Friedman A.A. Razmytye mnozhestva i ih primenenie [Fuzzy
sets and their applications]. Moscow, CEMI RSS Publ., 1998. 108 p.
[16]
Ptuskin A.S. Reshenie strategicheskih zadach v usloviyah razmytoy informacii
[The solution of strategic problems in conditions of fuzzy information]. Moscow, Dashkov &
K Publ., 2003. 240 p.
[17]
Orlov A.I., Lucenko E.V. Sistemnaya nechetkaya intervalnaya matematika [Systemic
interval fuzzy mathematic]. Krasnodar, KubSAU Publ., 2014. 600 p.