18 / 23
А.С. Птускин, Е. Левнер, Ю.М. Жукова
122
ISSN 0236-3941. Вестник МГТУ им. Н.Э. Баумана. Сер. Машиностроение. 2016. № 6
10.
Belton V., Stewart T.
Multiple criteria decision analysis. An integrated approach. Dordrecht,
Netherlands, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002. 372 p. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-1495-4
11.
Huang I.B., Keisler J., Linkov I
. Multi-criteria decision analysis in environmental science:
ten years of applications and trends // Science of the Total Environment. 2011. Vol. 409. No.
19. P. 3578–3594. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.06.022
12.
Ibáñez-Forés V., Bovea M.D., Pérez-Belis V.
A holistic review of applied methodologies for as-
sessing and selecting the optimal technological alternative from a sustainability perspective // Jour-
nal of Cleaner Production. 2014. Vol. 70. P. 259–281. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.082
13.
Bréchet T., Tulkens H.
Beyond BAT: selecting optimal combinations of available tech-
niques, with an example from the limestone industry // Journal of Environmental Manage-
ment. 2009. Vol. 90. No. 5. P. 1790–1801. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.11.012
14.
Птускин А.С.
Нечеткие модели и методы в менеджменте. М.: Изд-во МГТУ
им. Н.Э. Баумана, 2008. 216 с.
15.
Левнер Е.В., Птускин А.С., Фридман А.А.
Размытые множества и их применение.
М.: ЦЭМИ РАН, 1998. 108 с.
16.
Птускин А.С.
Решение стратегических задач в условиях размытой информации.
М.: ИТК «Дашков и К
о
», 2003. 240 с.
17.
Орлов А.И., Луценко Е.В.
Системная нечеткая интервальная математика. Краснодар:
КубГАУ, 2014. 600 с.
18.
Cengiz K.
Fuzzy multi-criteria decision making: theory and applications with recent devel-
opments. Springer, 2008. 591 р. DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-76813-7
19.
Herva M., Roca E.
Review of combined approaches and multi-criteria analysis for corporate
environmental evaluation // Journal of Cleaner Production. 2013. Vol. 39. P. 355–371.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.07.058
20.
Wang J.J., Jing Y.Y., Zhang C.F., Zhao J.H.
Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in
sustainable energy decision-making // Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2009. Vol. 13. No. 9.
P. 2263–2278. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2009.06.021
21.
Baysal M.E., Sarucan A., Kahraman C., Engin O.
The selection of renewable energy power
plant technology using fuzzy data envelopment analysis // Proceedings of the 2011 World
Congress on Engineering. 2011. P. 1140–1143.
22.
Bonano E.J., Apostolakis G.E., Salter P.F., Ghassemi A., Jennings S.
Application of risk as-
sessment and decision analysis to the evaluation, ranking and selection of environmental re-
mediation alternatives // J. Hazard. Mater. 2000. Vol. 71. No. 1-3. P. 35–57.
DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3894(99)00071-0
23.
Chowdhury S., Husain T.
Evaluation of drinking water treatment technology: an entropy-
based fuzzy application // J. Environ. Eng. 2006. Vol. 132. No. 10. P. 1264–1271.
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2006)132:10(1264)
24.
Geldermann J., Rentz O.
Integrated technique assessment with imprecise information as a
support for the determination of best available techniques (BAT) // Spektrum. 2001. Vol. 23.
No. 1. P. 137–157. DOI: 10.1007/PL00013341
25.
Krajnc D., Mele M., Glavic P.
Fuzzy logic model for the performance benchmarking of sug-
ar plants by considering best available techniques // Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2007. Vol. 52.
No. 2. P. 314–330. DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2007.05.001