Background Image
Previous Page  14 / 21 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 14 / 21 Next Page
Page Background

u

0

|

r

=

R

=

1

60Δ

[10

T

6

72

T

5

+

+225

T

4

400

T

3

+ 450

T

2

360

T

1

+ 147

E

] +

Δ

6

7

u

VII

;

u

0

|

r

=

R

δ

=

1

60Δ

[12

T

5

75

T

4

+200

T

3

300

T

2

+300

T

1

137

E

] +

Δ

5

6

u

VI

;

u

0

|

r

=

R

δ

=

1

60Δ

[

10

T

6

+ 72

T

5

225

T

4

+ 400

T

3

450

T

2

+ 360

T

1

147

E

] +

Δ

6

7

u

VII

.

The main results of computation.

The research computation was

performed using the computing methods developed for experimental

conditions (see Table 1) implemented in a one-diaphragm aerodynamic

shock tube (at the Institute for Problem Mechanics, RAS) [8, 9]. During

the experiments on the shock tube mentioned above, which were then

subjected to the numerical analysis, at the initial instant of time (i.e., before

the rupture of the diaphragm), the low pressure chamber (LP chamber)

was filled with air (test gas) at pressure

p

LP c

[mbar] and temperature

T

= 298

.

15

K, while the high pressure chamber (HP chamber) was

filled with a compressed air at pressure

P

HP c

[mbar] and temperature

T

= 298

.

15

K. The experimental facility at the Institute for Applied

Mechanics, RAS, looks like a tube of an uniform cross-section (internal

diameter

D

= 0

.

8

m; length of low pressure chamber

L

LP c

= 7

.

35

m;

length of high pressure chamber

L

HP c

= 1

.

97

m) and is designed for the

value range of Mach numbers SW

M

= 6

. . .

12]

.

No

1 2 3 4 5

6

7

8 9 10 11

p

HPc

, atm 10 10.2 22 19 13.2 19.5 19.5 20.5 21 36 34

p

LPc

, atm 0.3 15 6.6 100 2 0.7 5.6 100 100 1 1

In Fig. 2, the layout chart of the pressure gauge locations used for

obtaining the experimental time dependences of pressure

P

(

t

)

(in different

spatial points) is shown.

In Fig. 3, the experimental (Experiment 4) time dependencies of

pressure

P

(

t

)

for the second and third pressure gauges are shown (pressure

gauge 1 is at the right end of the shock tube plane (the Institute of Problem

Mechanics, RAS, see Fig. 2.)

From the graphs in Fig. 3, it follows that only gas-dynamic parameters

can be evaluated (by the times of the shock wave arrivals to the pressure

gauges) behind the front of the initial shock wave (gauge 2:

z

= 5

.

78

m,

t

= 8

.

92

ms; gauge 3:

z

= 9

.

22

m,

t

= 14

ms):

D

SW

0

.

7

km/s,

u

2

=

2

γ

1

+ 1

D

SW

0

.

6

km/s,

p

2

=

2

γ

1

+ 1

ρ

1

D

2

SW

0

.

5

atm. From

16 ISSN 0236-3941. HERALD of the BMSTU. Series “Mechanical Engineering”. 2014. No. 1