Background Image
Previous Page  7 / 10 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 7 / 10 Next Page
Page Background

Fig. 4. Rocket engine with vortex cooling [10]

(calculated with the help of CEA-2000 software), for СН

4

+ О

2

— 98%,

for CO + O

2

— 86%. Furthermore, the temperature of the chamber wall

increased by 2. . . 8

С compared to the initial temperature for the H

2

+ O

2

rocket engine.

The potential of this chamber arrangement method is evident; however,

the experimental data in [10] are insufficient to draw conclusions about

the thermal efficiency of this cooling method. Duration of LTRE hot tests

is not enough to determine both the combustion efficiency and a specific

impulse. It does not provide adequate information on the stationary thermal

state of the combustion chamber wall as well.

The influence of the coolant injection angle on the film cooling

efficiency was studied in [11–14] (Fig. 6,

b

). The results of the experiments

indicate that the increase of the coolant injection angle results in decreasing

the cooling efficiency, with its dropping to the minimum during the radial

injection. This can be attributed to the film being washed out by the main

flow because of different flow directions and rates.

Fig. 5. Image of the combustion zone limited by the internal vortex [10]

86 ISSN 0236-3941. HERALD of the BMSTU. Series “Mechanical Engineering”. 2014. No. 1