|

Analysis of the characteristic features of operational process in liquid rocket engine combustion chamber with jet-centrifugal and centrifugal-centrifugal injectors

Authors: Mosolov S.V., Sidlerov D.A. Published: 29.03.2016
Published in issue: #2(107)/2016  

DOI: 10.18698/0236-3941-2016-2-60-71

 
Category: Aviation and Rocket-Space Engineering | Chapter: Thermal, Electric Jet Engines, and Power Plants of Aircrafts  
Keywords: liquid rocket engine, combustion chamber, numerical simulation, fuel burning

The purpose of this work is to conduct the computational research and comparative analysis of characteristic features of flowing, mixing and combustion processes inside the model multiinjector combustion chambers by means of numerical simulation methods, elaborated in Keldysh Research Centre. In this article we present the results of examining the operational process and its features inside the model multiinjector combustion chamber with regular arrangement of coaxial two-component mixing elements. We deal with two types of mixing elements: jet-centrifugal and centrifugal-centrifugal. In both elements swirled kerosene sheet is fed through the peripheral annular canal. Oxygen rich generator gas jet is fed through the central canal. This jet has no swirl for the jet-centrifugal injector, and obtains the swirl in the same direction as the kerosene sheet for the centrifugal-centrifugal injector. The findings of the research illustrate, that the use of centrifugal-centrifugal injectors leads to significant activation of fuel mixing and burnup inside the flow core. This effect is caused mainly by the increased turbulence generation and deformation of swirled jets in transversal direction during their interaction inside the combustion chamber. The use of jet-centrifugal injectors for near wall row provides acceptable thermal and concentration limits for the walls of the chamber.

References

[1] Borghi R., Lacas F. Modeling of Liquid-Propellant Spray Combustion in Rocket Engine Combustion. 2nd International Symposium on Liquid Rocket Propulsion. ONERA-Chatillon, France, June 19-21, 1995, pp. 7-1-7-26.

[2] Yang V., Lafon P. et al. Liquid Propellant Droplet Vaporization and Combustion. 2nd International Symposium on Liquid Rocket Propulsion. ONERA-Chatillon, France, June 19-21, 1995, pp. 8-1-8-16.

[3] Chen C.P., Chen Y.S. et al. Modeling of Turbulent Mixing in Liquid-Propellant Spray. 2nd International Symposium on Liquid Rocket Propulsion. ONERA-Chatillon. France, June 19-21, 1995, pp. 7-1-7-26.

[4] Gutheil E., Schlots D. et al. Numerical Approaches to Spray Combustion. 4th Symposium on Liquid Space Propulsion. DLR/Lmp, Germany, March 13-15, 2000.

[5] Tucker P.K., Shee W. et al. A Global Optimization Methodology for GO2/GH2 Single Element Injector Design. 4th Symposium on Liquid Space Propulsion. DLR/Lmp, Germany, March 13-15, 2000.

[6] Novikov A.V., Yagodnikov D.A., Burkal’tsev V.A., Lapitskiy V.I. Mathematical model and calculates the performance of the workflow in the combustion chamber rocket engine thrusters on the components of the methane-oxygen fuel. Vestn. Mosk. Gos. Tekh. Univ. im. N.E. Baumana, Mashinostr., Spetsvyp. [Herald of the Bauman Moscow State Tech. Univ., Mech. Eng., Spec. Issue], 2004, pp. 8-17 (in Russ.).

[7] Kalmykov G.P., Larionov A.A., Sidlerov D.A., Yanchilin L.A. Numerical simulation and investigation of working process features in high-duty combustion chambers. Journal of engineering thermophysics, 2008, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 196-217.

[8] Magnussen B.F., Hjertager B.H. On Mathematical Modeling of Turbulent Combustion with Special Emphasis on Soot Formation and Combustion. 16th Symp. (Int.) on Combustion. The Combustion Institute, 1976, p. 719.

[9] Gosman A.D., Ioannides E. Aspects of Computer Simulations of Liquid-Fuelled Combustors. AIAA, 1981, p. 81.

[10] Mostafa A.A., Mongia H.C. On the Turbulence-Particles Interaction in Turbulent Two-Phase Flows. AIAA, 1986, paper no. AIAA-86-0215.

[11] Khalil E.E., Spalding D.B., Whitelaw J.H. The Calculation of Local Flow Properties in Two-Dimensional Furnaces. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 1975, vol. 18, по. 16, pp. 775-791.

[12] Patankar S. Numerical Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow. N.Y., Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, 1980.

[13] Van-Doormaal J.P., Raithby G.D. Enhancements of the SIMPLE Method for Predicting Incompressible Fluid Flows. Numerical Heat Transfer, 1984, vol. 67, pp. 147-163.

[14] Patankar S.V. Recent Developments in Computational Heat Transfer. J. of Heat Transfer, 1988, vol. 110, iss. 4b, p. 1037. DOI: 10.1115/1.3250608

[15] Karki K.C., Mongia H.C. Recent Developments in Computational Combustion Dynamics. AIAA, 1989, paper no. AIAA-89-2808.

[16] Kalmykov G.P., Larionov A.A., Sidlerov D.A., Yanchilin L.A. Numerical simulation of operational processes in the combustion chamber and gas generator of oxygen-methane liquid rocket engine. EUCASS book Progress in Propulsion Physics, TORUS PRESS, 2009.

[17] Mosolov S.V, Sidlerov D.A., Ponomarev A.A., Smirnov Yu.L. Numerical research on the peculiarities of the operational process in LRE combustion chambers propelled by oxygen and hydrocarbons. Trudy MAI, 2012, iss. 58. Available at: http://www.mai.ru/science/trudy/eng/published.php?ID=33406&eng=Y

[18] Mosolov S.V., Sidlerov D.A., Ponomarev A.A. Comparative analyses of the peculiarities of the operational process in LRE combustion chambers with coaxial-jet and jet-centrifugal injectors using numerical simulation. Trudy MAI, 2012, iss. 58. Available at: http://www.mai.ru/science/trudy/eng/published.php?ID=34989&eng=Y

[19] Sidlerov D.A., Ponomarev A.A. Numerical simulation of fuel droplets evaporation and combustion regimes in the combustion chambers of liquid rocket engines. Trudy MAI, 2014, iss. 77. Available at: http://www.mai.ru/science/trudy/eng/published.php?ID=53138&eng=Y